Arab Environment Watch
An update and analysis of environmental policies and natural resources management in the Arab countries

Jordan's Nuclear Plan described by Khalid Toukan

In this text, translated from Arabic Dr Khalid Toukan the head of the Jordan Atomic Energy Commission describes some of the technical details of the proposed nuclear power programme in Jordan. The translation was posted here
 

In his interview with Al-Ra'y, Tuqan states that yellowcake would be produced from uranium excavated from Jordanian mines, or from phosphoric acid after processing (uranium extracted from phosphates). He suggests that contracts could be signed with specialized international companies to enrich uranium abroad, then send the enriched uranium back to Jordan. He explains that the raw material would come from Jordanian mines, but the enrichment operations intended for nuclear reactors would be carried out abroad. For this purpose, contracts would be signed with international companies, through tenders to provide uranium enrichment services abroad. This means that no uranium would be enriched inside the Kingdom.

Tuqan reveals that the nuclear reactor will tentatively be located 25 km southeast of Aqaba, and that an agreement will be signed with a specialized company to conduct an 18-month survey and study at the location starting next July. If the location is found to be unsuitable, the project will be moved to another location, most likely close to the Gulf of Aqaba, because the nuclear reactor has to be close to a water source. Tuqan notes that a tender has been offered to engage an international expert to conduct an economic feasibility study for the nuclear power plant, and draft the legislative and legal framework for establishing a nuclear power station company. Specifics are being prepared for the tender, and for inviting offers for participation in choosing the suitable technology for the nuclear reactor.

Explaining the mechanisms of the nuclear power plant's operations, Tuqan states that the station will eventually produce 1,000 megawatts of electricity, and that such production capacity would require 140 tons of yellowcake extracted from uranium. He said production in the Al-Wasat uranium mine is expected to reach 2,000 tons per year, and that there are plans for building a total of four nuclear power plants to generate and produce energy over the next two decades. When surplus uranium, of which nuclear reactors consume small amounts, is added up, it shows that in the future we will possess a substantial energy surplus that could transform the Kingdom into an energy exporting country. Tuqan also points out that building a nuclear power plant requires three years of preparations followed by five to six years of construction. According to estimates, the first nuclear power plant in Jordan could be operational in 2017-2018.

Tuqan said that the Jordanian-French Company for Uranium Mining has actually begun working in its concession zone in the Kingdom's central region (Sawwaqah, Khan al-Zabib), and it is expected to finish the feasibility studies by the end of 2010, after which work will begin to build the mine facilities, along with the industrial unit for processing raw uranium and extracting the yellowcake. Production is expected to begin in 2012.

Tuqan said that new areas are marked in the study for uranium exploration at Wadi al-Bahiyah, Wadi al-Sahab al-Abyad, and Al-Ruwayshid, and that for this purpose a memorandum of understanding has been signed with the British-Australian company, Rio Tinto. He said the JAEC is conducting laboratory studies for the production of the first samples of yellowcake in its own laboratories.

Tuqan disclosed that estimates and studies have indicated that uranium extracted from phosphate could supply Jordan with electricity for 30-40 years.

The following is the full text of the interview:

[Al-Khalidi] Talk about Jordan's nuclear programme is linked to the issue of the possible negative effects on the environment resulting from building a nuclear plant and reactors, especially of waste materials such as water. How could waste be dealt with, and does it have any possible effects"

[Tuqan] No waste water from the nuclear power plant will be pumped into the area, be it sea water or sweet water, because 80 million cubic metres of water will be produced by the refining stations for use in closed cycles to compensate for evaporation, as well as for internal use, and also to compensate for evaporation in the closed cooling cycle. Water will never be allowed to run into the surrounding area from the power plant.

[Al-Khalidi] What technology will be used in the nuclear power plant"

[Tuqan] First, let me explain that the nuclear power plant is divided into three sections. The first is the nuclear zone area where energy is produced, the second is the turbine zone where electricity is generated, and the third contains the transformers and the electricity distribution systems. The technology that will be employed does not use direct cooling, which, even if it is used, does not allow water to enter into the nuclear zone, but directs it to the zone that houses the turbines. In general, the technology that will be used may be summed up as "the closed cycle," whereby water is redirected through a complete closed cycle inside the reactor using 200-metre high cooling towers. Here the water is directly cooled in the towers, and the heat is expelled by the cooling fans.

[Al-Khalidi] What are the specifics of the location where the nuclear station will be built"

[Tuqan] The location chosen in Aqaba is 25 km southeast of the city. A contract will be signed with a company to carry out field studies and surveys. Work will begin in July, and last for 18 months. If the location is found to be unsuitable for the project, another one will be found, most likely in the Gulf of Aqaba, depending on the existence of a water source close to the location where the nuclear power plant is to be built. In the future, when the Al-Bahrayn water canal becomes a reality, it would be possible to search for other locations outside the Aqaba area.

Parallel to the launching of the studies related to the power plant's location, a tender has been launched to hire an international expert to conduct a feasibility study for the power plant project, and draft the legislative and legal framework for the establishment of a nuclear power plant. Currently, the specifics of the tender and the invitation to submit offers and participate in choosing the suitable technology for the nuclear power plant, studying nuclear waste management and securing stable nuclear fuel services are all being prepared in view of the fact that JAEC strategy is built on not leaving any single detail related to the project without research, without taking needed measures and making adequate preparations, even it is related to the project's waste products, such as radioactive waste.

[Al-Khalidi] What is the surface area of the location where the power plant will be built"

[Tuqan] The location under study in Aqaba is 4 square km, while a nuclear facility needs 200 dunums [ 200,000 square metres] for a nuclear power plant, the turbine zone and all the other auxiliaries attached to the station. Accordingly, in the future the location can accommodate up to four stations. I have already said that each station needs 200 dunums.

[Al-Khalidi] There is some vagueness and incoherence in statements about the nature of the nuclear power plant's operation, and about the effect on the surroundings, especially from the fuel, which is, of course, the uranium used in the reactor. Do you have any clarifications to make in this regard"

[Tuqan] All power plants, whether they generate energy by burning heavy fuel or natural gas, or by burning nuclear fuel instead of heavy fuel and gas, need their own fuel. In the case of nuclear fuel (which is 4 per cent enriched uranium), the burning occurs by splitting the nucleus, a process that in the end generates energy. In either case the process is the same, whether energy is produced in a traditional or nuclear power plant, in the sense that energy is produced by heating the steam to very high temperatures, pressurizing the vapour, and using it to run the turbines that generate energy.

[Al-Khalidi] This leads us to the issue of uranium to be used in the future power plant's nuclear reactors. Are there any dangers in using uranium as the only fuel in the reactors"

[Tuqan] I must explain that fuel used in reactors is 3-4 per cent enriched uranium. When this fuel is burnt in the reactors, the so-called consumed fuel is produced, and specialized operations are needed to manage and process what is called spent fuel. Highly radioactive materials are produced and processed, leaving behind the residue of splitting the nucleus. The residue is stored in special containers for 100-200 years before being discarded for good.

Laws regulating nuclear activity force countries that have signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty to curb nuclear arms proliferation, and allow them to enrich uranium within the rates mentioned above under direct IAEA supervision and control, and within the IAEA's guarantee system. Jordan is among the countries that have signed this treaty.

[Al-Khalidi] Does this mean that uranium will be enriched in the Kingdom, or that the country will use uranium enriched abroad"

[Tuqan] Yellowcake is extracted from uranium produced in the Kingdom's mines, or from phosphoric acid after it is manufactured (uranium extracted from phosphates). Contracts will be signed with specialized international companies to provide uranium enrichment services abroad. The enriched uranium would be sent back to the Kingdom. This means that the uranium would come from Jordanian mines, but the enrichment operations for use in the nuclear reactors will be carried out abroad. In this regard, contracts will be signed with international companies through tenders to provide enrichment services outside the country. No uranium will be enriched in the Kingdom.

[Al-Khalidi] In 2008 the opening of the first uranium mine in the Kingdom was announced. At what stage is work in the mines now"

[Tuqan] The Jordanian-French Company for Uranium Mining (the French partner is Ariva) began operations in July 2008 in its concession zone in central Jordan (Al-Sawwaqah, Khan al-Zabib), after completing detailed studies of the project, digging ditches and wells in order to determine the deposits accurately, and conducting the economic feasibility studies. Currently, there are operations sites in the Al-Sawwaqah and Khan Al-Zabib regions. The economic feasibility studies are expected to be completed by the end of 2010, following which work will begin to build the mine's sections and attached facilities, and to construct the industrial units designed to process the raw materials and extract yellowcake. The production stage is expected to begin in 2012.

[Al-Khalidi] Are there any new uranium exploration areas in the Kingdom other than Al-Sawwaqah and Khan al-Zabib"

[Tuqan] There are new uranium exploration areas in the country under study in the Wadi al-Bahiyah, Wadi al-Sahab al-Abyad, and Al-Ruwayshid regions, where exploration and excavation studies are under way by JAEC, based on a memorandum of understanding signed for this purpose with the British-Australian company Rio Tinto. I would also like to point out that JAEC has begun laboratory studies for the production of preliminary samples of yellowcake in its own laboratories.

[Al-Khalidi] The phosphates company, in cooperation with the JAEC, is conducting yellowcake extraction studies on the basis of related agreements. What about them"

[Tuqan] The JAEC is carrying out studies in cooperation with the Jordanian Phosphates Company to produce yellowcake from phosphoric acid. The JAEC has carried out a study through a contract signed with an international company, and the phosphates company financed this study. The study is also designed to produce yellowcake for energy production in the nuclear reactors. Estimates and studies have indicated that the uranium that is to be extracted from phosphates can provide Jordan with electricity for the coming 30-40 years.

[Al-Khalidi] I would like to ask you about the concession rights involved in uranium production, concerning the state's rights in this regard"

[Tuqan] I must assert that the nation's uranium wealth is the property of the Jordanian State. However, there are cooperation agreements to carry out studies related to mining, opening up mines, and planning for building industrial compounds to produce yellowcake according to joint agreements between the JAEC and the selected companies, on the basis of the financial and economic rights, rates, terms and other considerations determined by bilateral agreements between the Jordanian Government and the concerned countries.

[Al-Khalidi] Regarding estimated uranium deposits in many areas of the Kingdom, what are the trends for dealing with such volume"

[Tuqan] Suffice to say our uranium production in the Al-Wasat mine will average about 2,000 tons annually. This is a huge quantity if we take into consideration expected future production rates in the Kingdom's other promising regions. A limited quantity of yellowcake extracted from uranium in the nuclear reactors, as well as other quantities, would be earmarked for export as an important, huge economic resource for the Kingdom.

[Al-Khalidi] Will you export and sell all surplus quantities exceeding the needs of the Jordanian reactors"

[Tuqan] We are trying to build up a strategic stockpile of local uranium, and will have at our disposal surplus quantities of uranium, part of which will be earmarked for export and another part for establishing our strategic stockpile of this raw material, the value of which is constantly increasing.

[Al-Khalidi] You have made statements suggesting that Jordan will be transformed from an energy importer to energy exporter by 2030. What are the prospects for achieving this target, considering that the Kingdom relies on imported energy for 94 per cent of the total energy consumption"

[Tuqan] To start with, these statements are not exaggerated, as we have facts to support prediction, which, based on sufficient and clear data, may be summed up as follows: Currently, the Kingdom generates 2,400 megawatts of electricity annually with existing power plants. In the future, the nuclear station will produce 1,000 megawatts of electricity. Producing such a quantity needs 140 tons of yellowcake annually, extracted from uranium. On the other side, our uranium production at the Al-Wasat mine will reach 2,000 tons per year. Additionally, our future plans are centred on building four nuclear stations in the coming two decades for energy production. If we add to this the uranium surplus, of which nuclear reactors consume only a small part, it becomes clear, without exaggeration, that a large quantity of surplus energy will be accrued, which, with God's will, can transform the Kingdom into an energy exporter. Here I would like to point out that building the first reactor needs three years of preparation and five to six years of construction. According to estimates, the first nuclear station in Jordan is expected to operate during 2017-2018.

[Al-Khalidi] Do you expect to sign any new agreements related to the nuclear programme soon"

[Tuqan] We expect to sign a cooperation agreement between Jordan and Russia on 22 May in Moscow. The agreement is for nuclear cooperation. In June, a nuclear cooperation agreement will be signed with Britain, and negotiations for nuclear cooperation agreements with Romania, Spain, Japan, and Argentina will be launched. The JAEC will also sign an agreement for building a research nuclear reactor, where students will be able to conduct research and embark on training and academic studies.

[Al-Khalidi] There are expectations concerning the nomination of several countries with which agreements have been reached as candidates for building the nuclear power plant in Jordan. Which are the most likely countries to build the first nuclear power plant in the Kingdom"

[Tuqan] The most likely candidate countries to build the nuclear station and provide us with nuclear reactors are South Korea, France, Canada, Russia, and the United States, and it should be noted that the nuclear energy produced is intended to cut energy production costs by 50 per cent. We should not forget that the world is currently going through a nuclear revival period, as there are 60 countries from the developing world and Asia engaged in projects aimed at using nuclear energy to generate electricity.

Source: Al-Ra'y, Amman, in Arabic 3 May 09 pp 40-41


Bookmark this post:KhabberDel.ici.ousDiggRedditY! MyWebGoogle Bookmarks
(7) comments


Add a Comment

On May, 12, 2009 5:26 PM , Catalyst said:

As a young Jordanian engineering student I find it difficult for me to be in agreement with the proposed plan.

1- What about the waste?
2- The world is going RENEWABLE , why are we going NUCLEAR?
3- Why do we want to become an energy exporter than envision us becoming leaders in renewable energy and sustainability technologies??


On May, 13, 2009 1:59 PM , batirw
from Jordan said:

Brilliant questions. None of them have been answered properly yet by the pro-nuclear propaganda. You may check my Arabic article about this
http://www.arabenvironment.net/arabic/archive/2009/4/856636.html


On August, 13, 2009 5:08 PM , ayoubabu
from Canada said:

It is true that the cost of electricity is less in nuclear power stations, but the risks are much higher.
where is the nuclear waste going after 100 years?
Are we going to use the waste or sell it to be used in Depleted Uranium weopons? How safe is the site against earthquakes as both suggested sites are close to the active seismic fault running North- South from the Jordan Valley down to Aqaba? How ready we will be to handle disasters in emergencies?
Is the decommisioning cost incopoerated in the analysis?
May be we dont have much choice, but I have always been a supporter of Wind Energy, no risks, low cost and hegemony free. That is, we will be independant rather than becoming dependant on foriegn technologies and expertise for decades to come!
Dr Ayoub Abu-Dayyeh
Montreal- Canada


On April, 29, 2010 1:04 AM , Bahjat Tabbara
from Jordan said:

To answer the questions:

1. Waste will be dealt with as the rest of the world deals with it (Dr. Khalid Touqan explained the process) that while it is not perfect, it is not a insolvable problem as we are adopting safe international standards. A solution is expected to be devised by the turn of the century; the waste can be stored for 100-200 years.

2. The world IS NOT going renewable; besides, renewable resources are of limited potential, alas useful as compliments (not substitutes) in most scenarios for any primary energy source; be it fossil fuel or nuclear. In the meantime, nuclear energy is primarily a competitor against fossil fuel. In both cases renewable energy would make a great compliment.

3. Exporting cheap electricity will help improve our BOP (Balance Of Payments). After-all, Syria's rubbish economy relies on burning black gold for the sake of lighting bulbs instead of useful export earnings?

- We may be leaders in renewable energy; but renewable energies have not advanced to a point where they are serious competitors to fossil fuels or nuclear energy.


When all costs are included; nuclear energy is much cheaper. What has changed since the 1980s?

1. Nuclear Energy has become cheaper, safer, more efficient to generate. A Generation III reactor to a Generation II is a bit like comparing an F1 car of the 2000s to an F1 car of the 1980s.

2. Fossil fuels have risen (in real terms) with very little advancement on thermal efficiencies. While combined cycle systems mean that you can use (say) gas turbines+steam & possibly a third application, it still is not competitive or a long-term solution.

3. Guarding a reactor to an oil/gas fired plant is a bit like comparing guarding the Crown Jewels to the Royal Palace. The Oil/Gas requires 40,000 barrels per day (at a 37.5% thermal efficiency) to generate some 1000 MWe-per hour. On the other hand, you nee


On April, 29, 2010 7:41 PM , د أيّوب أبو ديّة
from Jordan said:

إن الاستثمار في الطاقة النووية الإنشطارية بوصفها طاقة غير متجددة وغير مستدامة يصيبنا بالخوف والقلق معاً ليس فقط من المديونية الطويلة الأمد فحسب وإنما من المخاطر والتبعات السياسية والصحية والأمنية، مهما تضاءلت احتمالية حدوثها.
إن جل المفاعلات النووية في العالم اليوم التي تنتج نحو 17% من طاقة العالم من الكهرباء هي في دول الشمال الغنية، الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية، أوروبا واليابان. أما المفاعلات التي هي في طور الإنشاء اليوم في أوروبا فمحدودة؛ إذ سوف تتحول أوروبا في المستقبل إلى مهمة الترويج للطاقة النووية في العالم، فيما تشهد الولايات المتحدة وأستراليا وغيرهما نهضة عمرانية للمفاعلات النووية.
أي طاقة "مستدامة" هي التي تعتمد على الخبرات الأجنبية في تقييم الضرر البيئي وفي تخصيب اليورانيوم وفي التعامل مع النفايات النووية. وأي طاقة "مستدامة" هي التي سوف ينضب وقودها خلال عقود قليلة. ففي المفاعلات النووية المنتشرة اليوم في العالم والتي وصل عددها إلى 439 مفاعلاً في الشهر الأول من عام 2005، تستهلك نحو 66658 طن من اليورانيوم ((D. Jackson، الأمر الذي سوف يؤدي إلى نضوب الاحتياطي العالمي من اليورانيوم خلال 53 سنة، وهذه الفترة تتزامن مع تاريخ نضوب النفط على صعيد عالمي. وعلى الأرجح أن يكون النضوب أسرع إذا اتجهت المفاعلات النووية لإنتاج غاز الهيدروجين؛ لتزويد مركبات المستقبل بهذا الغاز الذي يتولد عن احتراقه ماء صافي، أو لإنتاج الماء الصالح للشرب.
وإذا افترضنا أن العالم العربي وحده مقدم على إقامة نحو 250 مفاعلاً نووياً في العقدين القادمين، فيمكننا تخيل العدد النهائي للمفاعلات في العالم، والذي ربما يزيد عن الألفين بعد عشرين عاماً، وهذا بدوره يعني أن نضوب اليورانيوم سيكون في غضون 20 – 25 عاماً بدلاً من 53 كما يقدر الباحثون المشار إليهم سابقاً، وهذا يؤكد أن الطاقة النووية التقليدية هي طاقة غير مستدامة وغير متجددة، ليس على صعيد احتكار التكنولوجيا العلمية والأعباء الاستراتيجية والأمنية فحسب، إنما على صعيد نضوب المادة الخام أيضاً.
وإذا كانت أسعار الطاقة المنتجة من الإنشطار النووي أقل، فنحن نتساءَل أنه إذا أضفنا تكلفة معالجة النفايات وإنتاج الغازات الدفيئة خلال التعدين والبناء فضلاً عن إعادة تأهيل وشطب المفاعل والتأمين على المخاطر المختلفة، هل تظل ال


On April, 29, 2010 7:44 PM , د أيّوب أبو ديّة
from Jordan said:

فإن الطاقة النووية في هذا العصر غير مستدامة، من حيث استخدامها لليورانيوم الطبيعي المحدود الكمية في العالم، أو من حيث ضررها على البيئة الذي يمتد لملايين السنين. فما الحل إذاً؟
إن الأرث الثقيل للمديونية وإرث النفايات النووية المشعة يتعارض مع قرارات التنمية المستدامة والأجندة 21 التي انطلقت مع قمة الأرض في البرازيل عام 1992 بإشراف الأمم المتحدة, كما يتعارض مع قرارات مؤتمر حقوق الانسان في بيئة نظيفة الذي انعقد في فيينا عام 1993. وعليه، فإن الحل ربما يكمن في مقولة العالم الفذ آينشتين:
"إن الرجل الذكي هو الذي يحل المشكلة، أما الرجل الحكيم فيجتنب حدوثها تماماً".
إن اجتناب حدوثها تماماَ يدفعنا صوب الطاقة المتجددة، إذ تشير التوقعات العالمية إلى زيادة الطلب على مصادر الطاقة المتجددة. والسبب هو تطور تقانة توليد الطاقة من الرياح والطاقة الشمسية، فضلاً عن أن المصادر الأخيرة أكثر أماناً وأبسط تكنولوجياً.
لقد تم بناء أكبر منشأة لتوليد الكهرباء من الطاقة الشمسية بقدرة 1GW مؤخراً، وفق تصريح شركة M&W Zander & Partner باستعمال الخلايا الضوئية PV cells، وهي تكاد تعادل نصف حاجة الأردن من الطاقة الكهربائية. كما تتطور اليوم صناعة توربينات الرياح بحيث أصبح الجهاز الواحد يتألف من عمود ضخم يحمل شفرة تمتد إلى قطر نحو 180 متر وتولد طاقة تتراوح بين MW 12 – 8، ويعني ذلك أن بضع مئات من هذه المراوح العملاقة التي شرعت أوروبا في تركيبها عام 2009 سوف تؤدي إلى اكتفاء الأردن من الطاقة. وإذا كانت تكلفة الطاقة المنتجة بهذه الوسائل أكبر قليلا من تكلفة إنتاجها بالوسائل التقليدية، كالغاز والنفط مثلاً، هل هذا سبب كاف لمحدودية طموحاتنا في هذا المجال، وبخاصة في ضوء ارتفاع أسعار النفط المضطرد وضبابية اتفاقات الغاز على المدى الطويل ومخاطر استخدام الطاقة النووية؟
وفضلاً عن أن طاقة الرياح، مثلاً، توفر وظائف أكثر بأربعة مرات أعداد الوظائف التي توفرها الطاقة النووية، فإنها لا تحتاج سوى إلى فترة زمنية قصيرة للإنتاج ولا تشكل أي خطر أمني ولا تستدعي مراقبته من قبل هيئات دولية تتعدى على السيادة الوطنية.
وإذا كان الحل الاقتصادي هو في الطاقة النووية، فلماذا تتجه أوروبا صوب إنتاج حاجتها من الكهرباء من الطاقة المتجددة النظيفة نحو منتصف القرن، كالطاقة الشمسية وطاقة الريا


On May, 02, 2010 4:57 PM , د أيّوب أبو ديّة
from Jordan said:

وإذا كان الحل الاقتصادي هو في الطاقة النووية، فلماذا تتجه أوروبا صوب إنتاج حاجتها من الكهرباء من الطاقة المتجددة النظيفة نحو منتصف القرن، كالطاقة الشمسية وطاقة الرياح، ولماذا تسعى لبناء مزارع للرياح على الأرض وفي البحار، ولماذا تتوسع لإنتاج الكهرباء من الطاقة الشمسية في بلادها وفي شمال إفريقيا على نحو هائل؟
إن فكرة التنوع في مصادر الطاقة فكرة في غاية الأهمية، ولكننا يجب أن نحذر من الاحتكارات الغربية في مجال الطاقة النووية ومخاطرها المتنوعة. لقد أصبح إنتاج تكنولوجيا الطاقة المتجددة متطوراً للغاية بحيث بات مؤخراً ينافس مصادر الطاقة التقليدية (طاقة الرياح، مثلاً، وضمن سرعات ريح مرتفعة). ويمكن الاستناد على الخبرات الغربية لفترة قصيرة نسبياً بحيث تصبح بعدها الكوادر الأردنية قادرة على إدارة شؤونها بنفسها إدارة تامة وكاملة ومن دون إشراف احترازي من هيئات دولية تنتهك السيادة الوطنية، على عكس الطاقة النووية الذي سيكون الإشراف عليها محتماً لفترات طويلة جداً لغايات ضمان السلامة العامة والأمن الإقليمي والعالمي وما إلى ذلك. وربما تتفاجئ دول الجنوب بعد بضع عقود من الاستثمار أن افتتاح المفاعلات للإنتاج التجاري غير ممكن!




Add a Comment

<<Home